1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (248 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
| Model | Cutlass | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7462 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 248 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4690 mm |
