1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 700 kg more than 1989 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 1989 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
| Model | Cutlass | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1989 |
| Engine Size | 7462 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 248 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1910 mm |
