1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (248 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 1360 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Westfield |
| Model | Cutlass | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 7462 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 248 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2320 mm |
