1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (248 HP) has 181 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2008 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2008 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
Model | Cutlass | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7462 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2490 mm |