1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 275 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Rover |
Model | Cutlass | 75 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7462 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 502 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2750 mm |