1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2008 Volvo S40
To start off, 2008 Volvo S40 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 545 kg more than 2008 Volvo S40.
Because 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volvo S40. (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2008 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
Model | Cutlass | S40 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7462 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 502 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1255 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2570 mm |