1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2009 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (248 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 96 kg more than 2009 Ford Falcon.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Falcon (533 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (502 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Compare all specifications:

1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass 2009 Ford Falcon
Make Oldsmobile Ford
Model Cutlass Falcon
Year Released 1972 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7462 cc 3983 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 248 HP 362 HP
Engine RPM 4200 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 502 Nm 533 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Vehicle Weight 1800 kg 1704 kg
Vehicle Length 5270 mm 4967 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1868 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1433 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2838 mm