1972 Plymouth Road Runner vs. 2010 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2010 Nissan Armada is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Plymouth Road Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Plymouth Road Runner would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Armada weights approximately 921 kg more than 1972 Plymouth Road Runner.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 1972 Plymouth Road Runner has manual transmission. 1972 Plymouth Road Runner will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Plymouth Road Runner | 2010 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Plymouth | Nissan |
| Model | Road Runner | Armada |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5563 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 2521 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 3129 mm |
