1972 Reliant Rebel vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1972 Reliant Rebel. (31 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1972 Reliant Rebel.
Because 1972 Reliant Rebel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Reliant Rebel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Reliant Rebel | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Reliant | Ford |
| Model | Rebel | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 701 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3510 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2490 mm |
