1972 Renault 15 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 15 would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (190 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1972 Renault 15. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 815 kg more than 1972 Renault 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Renault 15. (98 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Renault 15.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Renault 15 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Renault | Toyota |
| Model | 15 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 3376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 98 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 82 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 100 L |
