1972 Renault 4 vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 207 more horse power than 1972 Renault 4. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 4.
Because 2009 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Renault 4 | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Renault | Holden |
| Model | 4 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 240 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
