1972 Renault 4 vs. 2010 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2010 Ford Falcon is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1972 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Falcon weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1972 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Renault 4 | 2010 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | 4 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 654 kg | 1704 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4955 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1868 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2838 mm |
