1972 Renault 5 vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 5 would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1972 Renault 5. (43 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo C30 weights approximately 863 kg more than 1972 Renault 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 256 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Renault 5. (64 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Renault 5 | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Renault | Volvo |
Model | 5 | C30 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 2520 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2650 mm |