1972 Renault 5 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 5 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 327 more horse power than 1972 Renault 5. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 5.
Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Renault 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Renault 5. (53 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Renault 5 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Renault | Holden |
| Model | 5 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 782 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 53 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
