1972 Renault 5 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 5 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1972 Renault 5. (33 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Renault 5. (53 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Renault 5 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 5 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 782 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 53 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2601 mm |