1972 Renault 5 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 5 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (269 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1972 Renault 5. (43 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1192 kg more than 1972 Renault 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Renault 5. (64 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Renault 5 | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Renault | Mazda |
Model | 5 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 956 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1927 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2875 mm |