1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Ford |
| Model | Corniche | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1972 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4690 mm |
