1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche vs. 2003 Audi TT
To start off, 2003 Audi TT is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 970 kg more than 2003 Audi TT.
Because 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Rolls-Royce Corniche | 2003 Audi TT | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Audi |
Model | Corniche | TT |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2280 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2430 mm |