1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 219 kg more than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Jeep |
Model | Silver Shadow | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 3965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2118 kg | 1899 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 78 L |