1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 588 kg more than 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Hi-Ace |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2237 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 16 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2118 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 70 L |
