1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2005 Daihatsu YRV
To start off, 2005 Daihatsu YRV is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1208 kg more than 2005 Daihatsu YRV.
Because 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daihatsu YRV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2005 Daihatsu YRV | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Daihatsu |
| Model | Silver Shadow | YRV |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2118 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 40 L |
