1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2005 SsangYong Actyon
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Actyon is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 342 kg more than 2005 SsangYong Actyon.
Because 2005 SsangYong Actyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Actyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2005 SsangYong Actyon | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | SsangYong |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Actyon |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2118 kg | 1776 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 75 L |
