1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 583 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Because 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Rover |
Model | Silver Shadow | 75 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2118 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 65 L |