1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2011 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2011 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 597 kg more than 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2011 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2011 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2118 kg | 2715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1956 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 3099 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 100 L |
