1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1278 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Smart |
Model | Silver Shadow | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2118 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 33 L |