1972 Rover 2000 vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,358 cc, 2006 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Camry (154 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1972 Rover 2000. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover 2000.
Because 1972 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Camry (217 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover 2000. (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Rover 2000 | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Rover | Toyota |
| Model | 2000 | Camry |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2358 cc |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 172 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2730 mm |
