1972 Rover 3.5 vs. 2003 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2003 Samsung SM3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover 3.5 (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2003 Samsung SM3. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover 3.5 should accelerate faster than 2003 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover 3.5 weights approximately 475 kg more than 2003 Samsung SM3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Rover 3.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover 3.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Samsung SM3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover 3.5 (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1972 Rover 3.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Rover 3.5 | 2003 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Rover | Samsung |
Model | 3.5 | SM3 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3532 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 276 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2540 mm |