1972 Rover 3.5 vs. 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+
To start off, 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+ is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover 3.5 (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+. (75 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover 3.5 should accelerate faster than 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover 3.5 weights approximately 660 kg more than 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Rover 3.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover 3.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover 3.5 (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+. (117 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1972 Rover 3.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+. 1972 Rover 3.5 has automatic transmission and 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+ has manual transmission. 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Rover 3.5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Rover 3.5 | 2003 Suzuki Wagon R+ | |
Make | Rover | Suzuki |
Model | 3.5 | Wagon R+ |
Year Released | 1972 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3532 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 276 Nm | 117 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.1 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1635 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2340 mm |