1972 Rover 3.5 vs. 2009 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saab 03-Sep (207 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1972 Rover 3.5. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Because 1972 Rover 3.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover 3.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover 3.5 (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Saab 03-Sep. (221 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1972 Rover 3.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Saab 03-Sep.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Rover 3.5 | 2009 Saab 03-Sep | |
| Make | Rover | Saab |
| Model | 3.5 | 03-Sep |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3532 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 276 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2710 mm |
