1972 Rover 3.5 vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1972 Rover 3.5. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Rover 3.5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover 3.5. (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Rover 3.5 | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Rover | Audi |
Model | 3.5 | TT |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3532 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 276 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2469 mm |