1972 Rover 3.5 vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (161 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1972 Rover 3.5. (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Because 2010 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Rover 3.5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover 3.5. (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover 3.5.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Rover 3.5 | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
Make | Rover | Peugeot |
Model | 3.5 | 3008 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3532 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 276 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1837 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1639 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2613 mm |