1972 Rover P5B vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 1972 Rover P5B is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover P5B (158 HP) has 91 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover P5B weights approximately 580 kg more than 1968 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover P5B (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1972 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Rover P5B | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Rover | Volvo |
Model | P5B | 120 |
Year Released | 1972 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 3528 cc | 1777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 295 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2610 mm |