1972 Rover P5B vs. 1996 Rover 200

To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover P5B would be higher. At 3,528 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover P5B is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover P5B (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover P5B should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover P5B weights approximately 375 kg more than 1996 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1972 Rover P5B is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover P5B. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover P5B (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1972 Rover P5B will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200. 1972 Rover P5B has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Rover P5B will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: