1972 Saab 99 vs. 2010 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Equator is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Saab 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Saab 99 would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Equator (262 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1972 Saab 99. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1972 Saab 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Saab 99 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2010 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2010 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Saab 99, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Saab 99. (167 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Saab 99.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Saab 99 | 2010 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Saab | Suzuki |
Model | 99 | Equator |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 3954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 381 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |