1972 Seat 1500 vs. 2006 Mazda 2
To start off, 2006 Mazda 2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Seat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Seat 1500 (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Seat 1500 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 2.
Because 1972 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Seat 1500 | 2006 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Seat | Mazda |
Model | 1500 | 2 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2500 mm |