1972 Seat 1500 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1972 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1972 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 238 kg more than 1972 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Seat 1500 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Seat | Jeep |
Model | 1500 | Commander |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1481 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1398 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2790 mm |