1972 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1972 Suzuki Fronte. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1972 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1972 Suzuki Fronte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Suzuki Fronte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | Fronte | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 109 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2490 mm |