1972 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2012 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2012 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1972 Suzuki Fronte. (36 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1972 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2012 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 340 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Suzuki Fronte. (40 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Suzuki Fronte | 2012 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Suzuki | Mazda |
Model | Fronte | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 40 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 52 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 56 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 3010 mm |