1972 Suzuki LJ 20 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (175 Nm @ 1550 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Suzuki LJ 20 | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Suzuki | Volkswagen |
| Model | LJ 20 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 359 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1550 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
