1972 Triumph 2000 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Triumph 2000 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 80 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (195 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Triumph 2000 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Triumph | Volkswagen |
Model | 2000 | Polo |
Year Released | 1972 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1420 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |