1972 Triumph 2000 vs. 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 981 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR weights approximately 35 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 925 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Triumph 2000 | 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | Triumph | Koenigsegg |
| Model | 2000 | CCXR |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 1064 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 1060 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
