1972 Triumph 2000 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 368 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Impala (293 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Triumph 2000 | 2011 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Triumph | Chevrolet |
Model | 2000 | Impala |
Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 83 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 293 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2807 mm |