1972 Triumph 2000 vs. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE
To start off, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (335 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE weights approximately 635 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Triumph 2000 | 2013 Jaguar F-TYPE | |
| Make | Triumph | Jaguar |
| Model | 2000 | F-TYPE |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2909 mm |
