1972 Triumph GT6 vs. 2009 Volvo S40
To start off, 2009 Volvo S40 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph GT6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph GT6 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S40 (166 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1972 Triumph GT6. (104 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph GT6.
Because 1972 Triumph GT6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Triumph GT6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S40 (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph GT6. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph GT6.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Triumph GT6 | 2009 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Triumph | Volvo |
Model | GT6 | S40 |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74.8 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |