1972 Triumph TR6 vs. 2009 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph TR6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph TR6 would be higher. At 3,598 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 SsangYong Chairman W is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W (247 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1972 Triumph TR6. (104 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph TR6.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Chairman W (343 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph TR6. (194 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 SsangYong Chairman W will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph TR6.
Compare all specifications:
1972 Triumph TR6 | 2009 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Triumph | SsangYong |
Model | TR6 | Chairman W |
Year Released | 1972 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 194 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2970 mm |