1972 Triumph TR6 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph TR6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph TR6 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph TR6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 366 kg more than 1972 Triumph TR6.
Because 1972 Triumph TR6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Triumph TR6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Triumph TR6 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Triumph | Volvo |
| Model | TR6 | C30 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |
