1972 TVR M vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 TVR M would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 933 kg more than 1972 TVR M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 1972 TVR M has manual transmission. 1972 TVR M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 TVR M | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | TVR | Dodge |
| Model | M | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 372 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1833 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 5022 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1923 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2946 mm |
