1972 Volvo 164 vs. 2011 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2011 Peugeot 508 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Volvo 164 (156 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2011 Peugeot 508. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1972 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2011 Peugeot 508.
Because 1972 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Volvo 164 | 2011 Peugeot 508 | |
| Make | Volvo | Peugeot |
| Model | 164 | 508 |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2978 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 118 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4792 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1853 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2817 mm |
