1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z vs. 2010 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XK is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XK (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z. (251 HP @ 7500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z has manual transmission. 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1972 Zagato Ferrari 3Z | 2010 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Zagato | Jaguar |
| Model | Ferrari 3Z | XK |
| Year Released | 1972 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2953 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4793 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1328 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2751 mm |
