1972 Zastava 1300 vs. 2010 Renault Koleos

To start off, 2010 Renault Koleos is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Koleos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Koleos (148 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Koleos weights approximately 670 kg more than 1972 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Koleos (320 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2010 Renault Koleos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300. 2010 Renault Koleos has automatic transmission and 1972 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1972 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Renault Koleos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: